W A loyalty bonus could also be given to holders who keep their REG locked for multiple consecutive epochs. This would encourage long-term participation, reduce frequent transfers, and help maintain stability in engagement.
By combining these mechanisms, we could not only encourage small holder participation but also ensure that the system remains fair, sustainable, and resistant to fraud attempts.
it's just to encourage to keep lock, but it's not on the agenda of v1, too much complexity too much dev work for a temporary system and is there to take a first step forward and show the concept.
Too much complexity will scare away new users.
I don't agree with you on the point of the big carriers, if the big ones put thousands of $ on the table or even millions, that they didn't receive all their REG for free then they must have the same rights as the small ones.
Think for 1 minute, if the valuation of all the REG is $500 million, so 1 REG is $1, how are you going to do a x10 you will have to add 4.5 billion, do you think that it's the small carriers who will add all this money in the REG?
So if you have money and we tell you the more REG you have the less you will earn, are you going to put these big amounts?
A fair balance is needed, and two things must be separated, the voting right which must not grow as quickly with the number of REGs to avoid governance attacks (V2 will have mechanics for this), and on the other hand the invested capital which yields a return, here $1 must be able to yield the same thing regardless of whether you have put 1000 x $1 or only 100 x $1
