🇫🇷 Disponible en FR dans le deuxième post
🇺🇸
Proposal Summary:
This proposal aims to implement Step 2 of RIP00005 by establishing the selection process for the DAO's first 5 proposers. The process will take place in two distinct phases.
Phase 1: Application process and pre-selection (on the governance forum in the "Candidacy" section)
Phase 2: Final proposal (which will be submitted to DAO vote)
Motivation:
Establish a transparent and fair process for selecting the DAO's first proposers, in accordance with the criteria established in RIP00005.
Context:
Following the adoption of RIP00005, the DAO must now proceed with the election of its first 5 proposers. This step is crucial for the progressive decentralization of governance, allowing the DAO to begin managing its own responsibilities autonomously.
Scope of the proposer role:
Governance Forum:
- Assign a "writer" role to idea authors who are clearly supported by the community
- Participate in preparatory work to transform ideas into proposals
- Guide proposal creation and ensure they meet standards
- Ensure compliance with defined and approved processes and rules
- Make useful updates to proposal status (labels)
- When necessary, moderate and revive discussions that may have stalled
- Explain proposal execution data to less experienced members
OnChain:
- Creation of proposals on Tally (requires expertise in activating functions with correct parameters)
- Queueing proposals *
- Executing proposals *
*if not executed automatically by a bot, it may be necessary to do this manually via tally or gnosisscan
The proposer is not responsible for:
- Policing; they are invited to refocus debates on the subject and guide them
- Writing a proposal in place of the idea author
Detailed Specifications:
Phase 1 - Application Process and Pre-selection
RealT will be responsible for technical verification of applications to ensure candidates meet all criteria established in RIP00005.
As a DAO partner, RealT acts as a trusted party for this proposal to preserve the confidentiality of candidates who are free to disclose or withhold private information.
Additional info: governance v2 will change this principle to eliminate the need for trusted third parties, this will be achievable with Citizens NFTs.
Application Submission
Application Verification
Community Debate Period
Duration: 2 weeks
Assignment of the “candidate” role on the governance forum
Candidate presentations on the forum
Q&A sessions
Debates on proposed visions
The writing of the candidates' posts must be written at least in English, the candidate's mother tongue can be used in the 2nd post for better understanding.
Candidate debate space link: https://forum.realtoken.community/t/candidacy
Voting Format Poll
Phase 2 - Final Proposal
This phase depends on the voting format chosen by the DAO during phase 1.
❎
- Submission of a formal proposal per candidate including:
- Candidates' public data
- Voting modalities
- Execution timeline
The proposals that receive the most votes in favor will be elected (top 5 with most votes)
or
✅
- Submission of a formal proposal including:
- Final list of candidates (5)
- Candidates' public data
- Voting modalities
- Execution timeline
If the list of 5 candidates is rejected, a new proposal will be submitted with a shorter debate period to establish a new list of 5 candidates.
Implementation Steps:
- Weeks 1-2: Application period
- Weeks 1-2: Voting format poll
- Week 3: Application verification
- Weeks 4-5: Community debates
- Week 6: Final proposal drafting
- Week 7: DAO vote
Team:
- RealT: Technical verification of applications
- DAO: Participation in debates and final vote
Budget:
No budget is required for this proposal.
Financial Implications:
- Cost for candidates: 1000 REG locked in the incentive vault
- No direct cost for the DAO
Timeline:
- Phase 1: 5 weeks
- Phase 2: 2 weeks
- Total: 7 weeks
Objectives:
- Select 5 qualified and committed proposers
- Ensure a transparent and fair process
- Enable maximum community participation
- Initiate governance decentralization
Success Metrics:
- Minimum 7 eligible applications received
- Debate participation > 50 active members
- Poll participation rate > 100% of usual voters
- Final vote participation rate > 110% of usual voters
Mission Alignment:
This proposal directly follows RIP00005 and represents a crucial step in the progressive decentralization of DAO governance.
Key Terms:
- Eligible candidate: Member meeting all technical criteria of RIP00005
- Debate phase: Period dedicated to exchanges between candidates and community
- Voting format: Method chosen for proposer election
Discussion Points:
- Optimal duration of different phases
- Most appropriate format for community debates
- Potential additional criteria for differentiating candidates
- Replacement process in case of withdrawal
- Transition mechanisms to proposer functions
📍 CHECK-LIST: ( 🔲 : under discussion / ✅ : finalized / ❎: not applicable )
🔲 Proposal Summary
🔲 Motivation
🔲 Context
🔲 Implementation steps
🔲 Team
🔲 Budget / Allocation
🔲 Roadmap
🔲 Objectives
🔲 Key terms
